Murray Auchincloss, the chief executive of the struggling energy giant BPmega swerte, promised “a fundamental reset” of the company’s strategy on Tuesday while reporting disappointing earnings.

The shift comes after a long period of lackluster share performance compared with its industry peers. BP’s share price has perked up in recent months, but its perceived weakness and other shortcomings have attracted interest from Elliott Investment Management, a hedge fund known for shaking up its targets in an effort to improve shareholder value.

Mr. Auchincloss is reserving the details of BP’s shift for a presentation to investors on Feb. 26, but analysts seem to have little doubt about its direction.

BP is likely to reduce spending on low-emissions energy technologies like wind and hydrogen and try to boost oil and natural gas production, analysts say. “We would anticipate that there will be major changes in capital allocation, particularly around lower spending in the low-carbon arena,” Alastair Syme, an analyst at Citigroup,pnxbet official wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday.

Mr. Auchincloss appears headed toward a major reversal of the course taken by his predecessor, Bernard Looney, who left the company in 2023 after failing to disclose personal relationships with colleagues.

In the early part of this decade, when oil prices were low and governments were pressing companies to reduce emissions, Mr. Looney aggressively invested in green technologies like offshore wind and throttled back on oil and gas.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

The report — put out by the Republican members of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and the House Committee on Education and the Workforce — also recommends stricter guidelines around federally funded research, including significantly curtailing the ability of researchers who receive U.S. grants to work with Chinese universities and companies that have military ties.

After all, how exactly can a pollster know who is “likely” to vote, and who therefore will be the focus of their results? There’s no one right answer, and every polling firm has its own strategy.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.mega swerte